Gray v. State
605 So. 2d 1027, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11079, 1992 WL 296041
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 640 So. 2d 186 →
Opinion
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in not permitting the defense to peremptorily challenge prospective juror Martinez or in allowing the State to use a peremptory challenge to exclude prospective juror Minnis. See State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18, 22 (Fla.), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219, 108 S.Ct. 2873, 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988); State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984), clarified sub nom. State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla.1986). Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s conviction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. State, 605 So. 2d 1027, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11079, 1992 WL 296041 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
605 So. 2d 1027 (Gray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Neil
457 So. 2d 481 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1984)
State v. Slappy
522 So. 2d 18 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
State v. Castillo
486 So. 2d 565 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Galloway Farms, Inc. v. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance
487 U.S. 1219 (Supreme Court, 1988)