Gray v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gray v. State

143 So. 2d 555, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3077

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 17, 1962

DocketNo. 61-816

StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 2d 555 (Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. State, 143 So. 2d 555, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3077 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to set aside a conviction of a violation of § 838.011 Fla.Stat. F.S.A. [bribery statute], and urges that the information upon which he was tried was insufficient in law and that the evidence submitted by the State failed to establish his guilt.

A. review of the record on appeal discloses that the information was sufficient to charge the statutory crime of bribery, and fairly apprised the appellant with the nature of the offense with which he was charged. See: State v. Brock, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 607. Further, the evidence of guilt offered by the State is sufficient to sustain the judge’s refusal to grant a new trial. See: Parker v. State, 1940, 142 Fla. 210, 194 So. 484; Beck v. State, 1940, 142 Fla. 524, 195 So. 143. Therefore the conviction and sentence is affirmed.

' Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to set aside a conviction of a violation of § 838.011 Fla.Stat. F.S.A. [bribery statute], and urges that the information upon which he was tried was insufficient in law and that the evidence submitted by the State failed to establish his guilt.

A. review of the record on appeal discloses that the information was sufficient to charge the statutory crime of bribery, and fairly apprised the appellant with the nature of the offense with which he was charged. See: State v. Brock, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 607. Further, the evidence of guilt offered by the State is sufficient to sustain the judge’s refusal to grant a new trial. See: Parker v. State, 1940, 142 Fla. 210, 194 So. 484; Beck v. State, 1940, 142 Fla. 524, 195 So. 143. Therefore the conviction and sentence is affirmed.

' Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 So. 2d 555, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-state-fladistctapp-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack