Gray v. State

143 So. 2d 555, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3077
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3620
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 17, 1962·No. No. 61-816·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks to set aside a conviction of a violation of § 838.011 Fla.Stat. F.S.A. [bribery statute], and urges that the information upon which he was tried was insufficient in law and that the evidence submitted by the State failed to establish his guilt.

A. review of the record on appeal discloses that the information was sufficient to charge the statutory crime of bribery, and fairly apprised the appellant with the nature of the offense with which he was charged. See: State v. Brock, Fla.App.1958, 106 So.2d 607. Further, the evidence of guilt offered by the State is sufficient to sustain the judge’s refusal to grant a new trial. See: Parker v. State, 1940, 142 Fla. 210, 194 So. 484; Beck v. State, 1940, 142 Fla. 524, 195 So. 143. Therefore the conviction and sentence is affirmed.

' Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. State, 143 So. 2d 555, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3077 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

143 So. 2d 555 (Gray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Parker v. State
194 So. 484 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Beck v. State
195 So. 143 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
State v. Brock
106 So. 2d 607 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)