Gray v. State
346 So. 2d 978, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1922
This text of 346 So. 2d 978 (Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gray v. State, 346 So. 2d 978, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1922 (Ala. 1977).
Opinions
The petition in this case was based on an alleged conflict with prior decisions of the Court of Criminal Appeals, however, the petitioner failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 39(c)(4), ARAP, in preparing his petition. For this reason the writ must be quashed as having been improvidently granted.
WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Kellett v. State
577 So. 2d 915 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Wilbourn v. State
452 So. 2d 915 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Ex Parte Hightower
443 So. 2d 1272 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
346 So. 2d 978, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-state-ala-1977.