Gray v. State
346 So. 2d 978, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1922
Opinions
The petition in this case was based on an alleged conflict with prior decisions of the Court of Criminal Appeals, however, the petitioner failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 39(c)(4), ARAP, in preparing his petition. For this reason the writ must be quashed as having been improvidently granted.
WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. State, 346 So. 2d 978, 1977 Ala. LEXIS 1922 (Ala. 1977).
346 So. 2d 978 (Gray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kellett v. State
577 So. 2d 915 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1990)
Wilbourn v. State
452 So. 2d 915 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1984)
Ex Parte Hightower
443 So. 2d 1272 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)