Gray v. Starbird Landscape Nursery

191 So. 2d 432, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3030
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 1966
DocketNo. 35606
StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 2d 432 (Gray v. Starbird Landscape Nursery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. Starbird Landscape Nursery, 191 So. 2d 432, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3030 (Fla. 1966).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 27, 1966.

[433]*433We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record, and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammersla v. Price
190 So. 2d 765 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 2d 432, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-starbird-landscape-nursery-fla-1966.