Gray v. Starbird Landscape Nursery

Supreme Court of Florida

Gray v. Starbird Landscape Nursery

191 So. 2d 432, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3030

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 26, 1966·No. No. 35606·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 27, 1966.

[433] We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record, and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 27, 1966.

[433] We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record, and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorney’s fees is also denied.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. DREW, J., dissents.

Gray v. Starbird Landscape Nursery, 191 So. 2d 432, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3030 (Fla. 1966).

Pincite

191 So. 2d 432 (Gray v. Starbird Landscape Nursery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related