Gray v. South Atlantic Steamship Line, Inc.
This text of 21 F.R.D. 578 (Gray v. South Atlantic Steamship Line, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Insofar as concerns Civil Action No. 1579, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. Rule 41(b), 28 U.S.C. provides in part:
.’“(b) Involuntary Dismissal: Effect Thereof. For the failure of the plaintiff to prosecute * * * a defendant may move for the dismissal of an action or of any claim against him * * * ”
In my judgment, plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action for a period of three years under the circumstances above recited constitutes valid grounds for dismissal of the action. Salmon v. City of Stuart, 5 Cir., 1952, 194 F.2d 1004; Russell v. Cunningham, 9 Cir., 1956, 233 F.2d 806.
■ As to the libel (In Admiralty No. 1715), Admiralty Rule 38, 28 U.S.C.A., provides:
“Rule 38 Dismissal for failure: to prosecute
“If, in any admiralty suit, the libellant shall not appear and prosecute his suit, and comply with the orders of the court, he shall be deemed in default and contumacy; and the court may, on the application of the respondent or claimant, pronounce the suit to be deserted,, and the same may be dismissed with costs.”
This action is also dismissed upon the authority of Lynn v. American Barge Line Company, 3 Cir., 1955, 226 F.2d 934.
An Order will be entered in accordance herewith;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 F.R.D. 578, 1958 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4479, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-south-atlantic-steamship-line-inc-ded-1958.