Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedJanuary 22, 2025
Docket23-0461V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2025).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 23-0461V

ERIKA GRAY, as Natural Guardian Chief Special Master Corcoran and Legal Representative of her Minor Son, G.G., Filed: December 18, 2024

Petitioner, v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC, for Petitioner.

Elizabeth Andary, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

On March 31, 2023, Erika Gray filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”) on behalf of her minor son, G.G. Petitioner alleges that G.G. suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as a direct and proximate cause of the human papillomavirus (“HPV”) vaccine G.G. received on March 30, 2022. Petition at 1, ¶¶ 2, 16, 21; Stipulation, filed Dec. 18, 2024, ¶¶ 1-2, 4. Petitioner further alleges that G.G. received the vaccine within the United States, that G.G. suffered the residual effects of the SIRVA for more than six months, and that neither she nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for G.G.’s SIRVA, alleged as vaccine caused. Petition at ¶¶ 2, 15, 18-19; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that G.G.’s alleged Table SIRVA or

1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made

publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc , in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access .

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). its residual effects were caused by the HPV vaccine; and denies that the HPV vaccine caused G.G.’s current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on December 18, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

a) A lump sum of $1,000.00, representing compensation for actual unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to Petitioner, Erika Gray; and

b) An amount of $19,000.00 to purchase the annuity contract described in the Stipulation, made payable to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchase.

Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice

renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

ERIKA GRAY, as Natural Guardian and Legal·Representative of her Minor Son, G.G.,

Petitioner, No. 23-461V Chief Special Master Brian H. Corcoran v. ECF

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

l. Erika Gray ("petitioner"), on behalf of G.G., a minor child, filed a petition for vaccine

compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-l0

to -34 (the "Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related

to G.G.'s receipt of the human papillomavirus ("HPV") vaccine, which vaccine is contained in

the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. G.G. received the HPV vaccine on or about March 30, 2022.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that G.G. suffered a Table shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") as a result of the HPV vaccination. Petitioner further alleges that

G.G. experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on G.G.'s behalf as a result ofG.G.'s condition. 6. Respondent denies that G.G.'s alleged Table SIRVA or its residual effects were

caused by the HPV vaccine; and denies that the HPV vaccine caused G.G. any other injury or

G.G.'s current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments:

a. A lump sum of $1,000.00, which amount represents compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Erika Gray;

b. An amount of $19,000.00 to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 below, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the "Life Insurance Company").

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42

U.S.C. §300aa-15(a).

9. The Life Insurance Company must have a minimum of $250,000,000.00 capital and

surplus, exclusive of any mandatory security valuation reserve. The Life Insurance Company

must have one of the following ratings from two of the following rating organizations:

a. A.M. Best Company: A++, A+, A+g, A+p, A+r, or A+s;

b. Moody's Investor Service Claims Paying Rating: Aa3, Aa2, Aal, or Aaa;

c. Standard and Poor's Corporation Insurer Claims-Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+,orAAA;

d. Fitch Credit Rating Company, Insurance Company Claims Paying Ability Rating: AA-, AA, AA+, or AAA.

2 10.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(l)
§ 300aa-2l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2l(a)(l)
§ 300aa-l0
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l0
§ 300aa-l5
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l5(a)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gray v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2025.