Gray v. Schupp

4 Cal. 185
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1854
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 Cal. 185 (Gray v. Schupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. Schupp, 4 Cal. 185 (Cal. 1854).

Opinion

Mr. Ch. J. Murray

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. J. Heydeneeldt concurred.

This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of the District Court, reviewing, upon certiorari, the judgment of a Justice of the Peace.

The writ was issued Upon representation that the Justice . had exceeded his jurisdiction.

We have repeatedly held, that an appeal does not lie from the judgment of a Justice to the District Court. Our statute only authorizes a writ of review, or certiorari, in cases where there is not a plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal.

This is not such a case as is contemplated by the statute. The District Court erred in entertaining jurisdiction of the * case, and the error complained of might [186] have been corrected by an appeal to the County Court.

The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the certiorari issued by said Court dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redlands High School District v. Superior Court
125 P.2d 490 (California Supreme Court, 1942)
Chapman v. Justice Court of Tonopah Township
29 Nev. 154 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Cal. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-schupp-cal-1854.