Gray v. Schupp
This text of 4 Cal. 185 (Gray v. Schupp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of the District Court, reviewing, upon certiorari, the judgment of a Justice of the Peace.
The writ was issued Upon representation that the Justice . had exceeded his jurisdiction.
We have repeatedly held, that an appeal does not lie from the judgment of a Justice to the District Court. Our statute only authorizes a writ of review, or certiorari, in cases where there is not a plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal.
This is not such a case as is contemplated by the statute. The District Court erred in entertaining jurisdiction of the * case, and the error complained of might
The judgment of the District Court is reversed, and the certiorari issued by said Court dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Cal. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-schupp-cal-1854.