Gray v. Rothschild
This text of 2 Silv. Ct. App. 142 (Gray v. Rothschild) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It may very well be that each plaintiff has a good cause of action against the defendants, but the plaintiffs have none common to all or jointly with each other. Each individual and each firm may have been defrauded by similar, although not the same, representations, [143]*143"but the complaint shows that each has suffered separately, and its whole scope and meaning is inconsistent with the idea that the plaintiffs, or any two or more of them, are jointly prejudiced. As the objection appears upon the face ¿of the complaint, the demurrer was well taken.
The judgment should be affirmed.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Silv. Ct. App. 142, 20 N.Y. St. Rep. 789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-rothschild-ny-1889.