Gray v. Roberts
This text of 1 Ky. Op. 367 (Gray v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion oe the Court by
We think the two instructions which the Circuit Court seems to have given the jury at the request of both parties are at least as favorable to the appellant as he had a right to ask, and if the court erred in giving either of them it was to the prejudice of the appellee rather than the appellant; nor do we think the court committed any error in' overruling the motion of the appellant for a new trial. On some questions of fact in issues the evidence was conflicting, but on the whole it authorized the jury to find as they did, and, we think, the court rightly refused to grant appellant a new trial.
Therefore, the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ky. Op. 367, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-roberts-kyctapp-1866.