Gray v. Rife
This text of 260 A.D. 862 (Gray v. Rife) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, so far as appealed from, denying plaintiff’s motion to strike out as insufficient in law the first affirmative defense in defendant’s amended answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, so far as appealed from, denying plaintiff’s motion under rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out certain allegations and exhibits contained in the first affirmative defense, unanimously modified by striking from defendant’s amended answer the exhibit annexed and subjoined to Exhibit F containing the observations of the Municipal Court justice on the motion to set aside the verdict, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
260 A.D. 862, 23 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-rife-nyappdiv-1940.