Gray v. Richmond Public Schools

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 30, 2008·No. 08-1185·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1185

MARTHA GRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RICHMOND PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cv-00692-REP)

Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: June 30, 2008

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Martha Gray, Appellant Pro Se. William DeLaney Bayliss, Edward James Dillon, Jr., WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Martha Gray appeals the district court’s order denying

her motion for reconsideration of its grant of summary judgment in

favor of her employer in her employment discrimination action

brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as

amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gray v. Richmond

Pub. Sch., No. 3:04-cv-00692-REP (E.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. Richmond Public Schools, (4th Cir. 2008).

Gray v. Richmond Public Schools (Gray v. Richmond Public Schools) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e