Gray v. Reardon

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Gray v. Reardon

10 F. Cas. 1035, 2 D.C. 219, 2 Cranch 219

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. Cas. 1035 (Gray v. Reardon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. Reardon, 10 F. Cas. 1035, 2 D.C. 219, 2 Cranch 219 (circtddc 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

(nem. con.) upon the prayer of the plaintiff’s counsel, instructed the jury that if they should believe from the evidence, that the defendant, in mailing the sale, acted as the agent and by the authority of the plaintiff, and agreed to pay the plaintiff the proceeds, he is liable to the plaintiff in this action, although the jury should be satisfied by the evidence, that other persons were jointly interested with him in the slaves.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

(nem. con.) upon the prayer of the plaintiff’s counsel, instructed the jury that if they should believe from the evidence, that the defendant, in mailing the sale, acted as the agent and by the authority of the plaintiff, and agreed to pay the plaintiff the proceeds, he is liable to the plaintiff in this action, although the jury should be satisfied by the evidence, that other persons were jointly interested with him in the slaves.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F. Cas. 1035, 2 D.C. 219, 2 Cranch 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-reardon-circtddc-1820.