Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.

Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.

70 A. 1103, 221 Pa. 655, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 545
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 18, 1908·No. Appeals, Nos. 285, 301 and 302·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

These eases arose out of the same accident as the case of Beckman v. Railway Co., 219 Pa. 26, and are governed by.it. .For the reasons there stated the judgment in each case.is re-„ versed and it is directed' that judgment be entered for the defendant in each non obstante veredicto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co., 70 A. 1103, 221 Pa. 655, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 545 (Pa. 1908).

70 A. 1103 (Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beckman v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.
67 A. 983 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)