Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.
70 A. 1103, 221 Pa. 655, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 545
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 18, 1908
DocketAppeals, Nos. 285, 301 and 302
StatusPublished
This text of 70 A. 1103 (Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gray v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co., 70 A. 1103, 221 Pa. 655, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 545 (Pa. 1908).
Opinion
These eases arose out of the same accident as the case of Beckman v. Railway Co., 219 Pa. 26, and are governed by.it. .For the reasons there stated the judgment in each case.is re-„ versed and it is directed' that judgment be entered for the defendant in each non obstante veredicto.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Beckman v. Meadville & Cambridge Springs Street Railway Co.
67 A. 983 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1907)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 A. 1103, 221 Pa. 655, 1908 Pa. LEXIS 545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-meadville-cambridge-springs-street-railway-co-pa-1908.