Gray v. McLaughlin

26 Iowa 279
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 19, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 26 Iowa 279 (Gray v. McLaughlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. McLaughlin, 26 Iowa 279 (iowa 1868).

Opinion

Beck, J.

Evidence: declarations of one suffenns. ‘The errors assigned are the refusal of the court .to permit the witnesses to give in evidence the declarations of the deceased, in regard to the cause of her injuries and suffering, and also the character and nature of her suffering and sickness. The record does not disclose that these declarations, as to the cause of her suffering, were made at a time which would entitle them to be regarded as a part of the res gestee, and they were, therefore, properly excluded.

But her declarations as to the nature and character of her suffering' and sickness, should have been admitted in evidence.’ The expressions of one suffering from bodily pain and illness, relative to his health, are admissible in evidence, being'the natural consequence and usual indication of suffering and sickness. 1 Phillips Ev. (Cowen & Hill’s and Edward’s Notes) 182; 1 Greenleaf’s Ev. § 102. [281]*281The evidence was competent, and pertinent to the issues in the case. The suffering and pain endured by the deceased, were symptoms indicating the cause of her disease, whether it was the result of injuries and violence, or of weakness, infirmity and age, as averred in the answer. Her declarations, in regard to these symptoms, would have aided the jury in finding the cause of her death, an important question in the case.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffin-Middleton v. City of Cedar Falls
173 Iowa 619 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1915)
Langdon v. Ahrends
166 Iowa 636 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1914)
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Jackson
124 S.W. 241 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
State v. Blydenburg
112 N.W. 634 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1907)
Rupp v. Howard
86 N.W. 38 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1901)
Keyes v. City of Cedar Falls
78 N.W. 227 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1899)
Goss v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
50 Mo. App. 614 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)
McMurrin v. Rigby
45 N.W. 877 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1890)
Armstrong v. Town of Ackley
32 N.W. 180 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1887)
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Johns
36 Kan. 769 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1887)
McKeigue v. City of Janesville
31 N.W. 298 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1887)
Townsend v. City of Des Moines
42 Iowa 657 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Iowa 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-mclaughlin-iowa-1868.