Gray v. Maryland Parole Commission

43 F. App'x 561
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2002·No. No. 02-6906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Isaac Gray appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Maryland Parole Comm’n, No. CA-02-837-CCB (D. Md. filed May 24, 2002 & entered May 28, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [562] and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. Maryland Parole Commission, 43 F. App'x 561 (4th Cir. 2002).

43 F. App'x 561 (Gray v. Maryland Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gray v. Maryland Parole Commission
537 U.S. 1073 (Supreme Court, 2002)