Gray v. Jones

New York Supreme Court

Gray v. Jones

3 How. Pr. 71

DecidedSeptember 15, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 3 How. Pr. 71 (Gray v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. Jones, 3 How. Pr. 71 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Barculo, Justice

Held, in this case, that an order for a stay of proceedings to enable a party to make a special motion, could only extend to the first special term, held in the county where the suit was pending, or in an adjoining county. The party making the motion could not stay his adversary’s proceedings until the next special term in the county where the suit was pending, if in the mean time there should be a special term in an adjoining county.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barculo, Justice

Held, in this case, that an order for a stay of proceedings to enable a party to make a special motion, could only extend to the first special term, held in the county where the suit was pending, or in an adjoining county. The party making the motion could not stay his adversary’s proceedings until the next special term in the county where the suit was pending, if in the mean time there should be a special term in an adjoining county.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 How. Pr. 71, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-jones-nysupct-1847.