Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.
160 A.2d 99, 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 190
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided April 14, 1960·No. No. 2527·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment for the appellees following a trial finding by the court in their favor.
Appellants have failed to file either a statement of proceedings and evi[100] dence or a transcript of the trial testimony [our Rule 21(f) ]. It was incumbent on them to furnish us with a sufficient record to enable us to pass on the error of law assigned; absent such a record we have no way of determining whether the court was correct or not. Consequently we have no discretion except to affirm.1
It is so ordered.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co., 160 A.2d 99, 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 190 (D.C. 1960).
160 A.2d 99 (Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Douglas v. United States
197 A.2d 447 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1964)
Walker-Thomas Furniture Company v. Jackson
189 A.2d 123 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1963)