Home/District of Columbia Court of Appeals/Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.

Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.

160 A.2d 99, 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 190
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 14, 1960
DocketNo. 2527
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 160 A.2d 99 (Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. J. Leo Kolb Co., 160 A.2d 99, 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 190 (D.C. 1960).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment for the appellees following a trial finding by the court in their favor.

Appellants have failed to file either a statement of proceedings and evi[100]*100dence or a transcript of the trial testimony [our Rule 21(f) ]. It was incumbent on them to furnish us with a sufficient record to enable us to pass on the error of law assigned; absent such a record we have no way of determining whether the court was correct or not. Consequently we have no discretion except to affirm.1

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Douglas v. United States
197 A.2d 447 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1964)
Walker-Thomas Furniture Company v. Jackson
189 A.2d 123 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 A.2d 99, 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-j-leo-kolb-co-dc-1960.