Gray v. Inhabitants of Houlton
This text of 65 Me. 521 (Gray v. Inhabitants of Houlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was decided in Newbit v. Inhabitants of Appleton, 63 Maine, 491, that a “notice and request to the overseers,” required to be given by an inhabitant to enable him to recover of a town for the support of a pauper, was sufficient, if served upon [522]*522a single overseer. That case is not distinguishable from this. The reasons given for the decision in that case are as applicable here. The complaint required in this case must be a written one. It could not very well be delivered to more than one of the selectmen. It would then be the duty of that officer to communicate with his associates in regard to it. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
65 Me. 521, 1875 Me. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-inhabitants-of-houlton-me-1875.