Gray v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Gray v. Hudson

377 A.2d 295, 173 Conn. 230, 1977 Conn. LEXIS 843

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJune 28, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 377 A.2d 295 (Gray v. Hudson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. Hudson, 377 A.2d 295, 173 Conn. 230, 1977 Conn. LEXIS 843 (Colo. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This case came to this court as an appeal by the substituted plaintiff from a judgment of the Superior Court in Fairfield County, rendered in an ejectment aetion in which the defendant filed a counterclaim in the nature of an action to quiet title.

The trial was a lengthy one requiring a great deal of evidence and the tracing of titles and property claims. The trial court filed a detailed memorandum of decision. Gray v. Hudson, 34 Conn. Sup. 31, 375 A.2d 1039. After examining the record on appeal, including the plaintiff’s massive attack on the trial court’s finding, and after considering the briefs of the parties and their arguments, we have concluded that there is no error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken and that the memorandum of decision filed by the trial court adequately and properly answered the contentions of the parties. Reference to that decision of the trial court may be had for a detailed discussion of the facts and the applicable law. It would serve no useful purpose to repeat them here.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This case came to this court as an appeal by the substituted plaintiff from a judgment of the Superior Court in Fairfield County, rendered in an ejectment aetion in which the defendant filed a counterclaim in the nature of an action to quiet title.

The trial was a lengthy one requiring a great deal of evidence and the tracing of titles and property claims. The trial court filed a detailed memorandum of decision. Gray v. Hudson, 34 Conn. Sup. 31, 375 A.2d 1039. After examining the record on appeal, including the plaintiff’s massive attack on the trial court’s finding, and after considering the briefs of the parties and their arguments, we have concluded that there is no error in the judgment from which the appeal was taken and that the memorandum of decision filed by the trial court adequately and properly answered the contentions of the parties. Reference to that decision of the trial court may be had for a detailed discussion of the facts and the applicable law. It would serve no useful purpose to repeat them here.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

377 A.2d 295, 173 Conn. 230, 1977 Conn. LEXIS 843, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-hudson-conn-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack