Gray v. Howell
This text of Gray v. Howell (Gray v. Howell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3
4 Ty-Avry Gray, 5 Case No: 2:24-cv-02412-GMN-MDC Plaintiff, 6 vs. ORDER TO PAY THE FILING FEE OR FILE AN APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN 7 Christopher Howell, FORMA PAUPERIS
8 Defendant.
9 Incarcerated pro se plaintiff Ty-Avry Gray filed a complaint, but he did not pay the filing fee or 10 file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 11 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), a filing fee is required to commence a civil action in federal court. 12 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), a plaintiff may bring a civil action “without prepayment of fees or 13 14 security thereof” if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that demonstrates the plaintiff “is unable to 15 pay such fees or give security therefor.” Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee or file an application to 16 proceed in forma pauperis. ” If the plaintiff is a "prisoner" as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h), as 17 amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), he remains obligated to pay the entire fee in 18 installments, regardless of whether his action is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) & (2); 19 Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 20 Under the PLRA, a prisoner seeking leave to proceed IFP must submit a "certified copy of the 21 trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the six-month period 22 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v. King, 398 F.3d 23 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the Court must assess an initial 24 payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account for the past six months, or (b) the 25 average monthly balance in the account for the past six months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has no assets. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). The institution having custody of the 1 prisoner must collect subsequent payments, assessed at 20% of the preceding month's income, in any 2 month in which the prisoner's account exceeds $10, and forward those payments to the Court until the 3 4 entire filing fee is paid. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff must pay the full filing fee or file an 5 application to proceed in forma pauperis that complies with the PLRA. 6 ACCORDINGLY, 7 IT IS SO ORDERED that: 8 1. Plaintiff has until March 17, 2025, to pay the filing fee in full or file an application to proceed in 9 forma pauperis. 10 2. Plaintiff shall not file any documents with the Court until he has either paid the full filing fee, or 11 the Court has approved his application to proceed in forma pauperis and screened his complaint. 12 Any documents filed in violation of this Order will not be acted upon by the Court and may be 13 struck sua sponte from the docket. 14 3. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this case. 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 DATE: February 14, 2025. 18 _________________________ Hon. Maximiliano D. Couvillier, III 19 United States Magistrate Judge 20 NOTICE 21 Pursuant to Local Rules IB 3-1 and IB 3-2, a party may object to orders and reports and 22 23 recommendations issued by the magistrate judge. Objections must be in writing and filed with the Clerk 24 of the Court within fourteen days. LR IB 3-1, 3-2. The Supreme Court has held that the courts of appeal 25 2 may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file objections within the specified 1 time. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 142 (1985). 2 This circuit has also held that (1) failure to file objections within the specified time and (2) 3 4 failure to properly address and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District 5 Court's order and/or appeal factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 6 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 7 Pursuant to LR IA 3-1, the plaintiff must immediately file written notification with the court of any 8 change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party’s attorney, 9 or upon the opposing party if the party is unrepresented by counsel. Failure to comply with this rule may 10 result in dismissal of the action. 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gray v. Howell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-howell-nvd-2025.