Gray v. Heinze
This text of 174 A.D. 924 (Gray v. Heinze) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that there was a misappropriation of the funds of the railroad company by the defendants Heinze and Schultze, and that the other defendants knew or in the exercise of reasonably active discharge of their duties should have knowledge of such wrongful use and have prevented the same.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 A.D. 924, 160 N.Y.S. 1131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-heinze-nyappdiv-1916.