Gray v. Gray

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gray v. Gray

391 S.W.3d 911, 2013 WL 541967, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 187

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2013·No. No. ED 98135·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a court-tried case. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in a court-tried case. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gray v. Gray, 391 S.W.3d 911, 2013 WL 541967, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 187 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

391 S.W.3d 911 (Gray v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related