Gray v. Gray
This text of 25 N.E. 91 (Gray v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Pub. Sts. c. 151, § 13, provide that an appeal from a single justice of this court in equity “ shall thereupon be pending before the full court, who shall hear and determine the same.” Appeals from the Probate Court to the Supreme Judicial Court are to be entered on the same docket, and are to have the same rights as to hearing and determination, as cases in equity. Pub. Sts. c. 156, § 11. An appeal from a single justice of this court upon a decree rendered in a probate matter must have the same effect as an appeal from a decree in a suit in equity, and by the force of the appeal is to be treated according to the statute as pending in the full court.
The St. of 1888, c. 94, altering the Pub. Sts. c. 150, § 16, so as to provide that, upon the non-entry of an appeal or of exceptions in this court, application for an affirmance of judgment, etc., may be made to the court allowing the exceptions or from which the appeal was taken, does not affect appeals of this character.
The appellant having waived his appeal from the decree of the single justice, that decree will be, affirmed here, and the case remanded to the Probate Court. Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 N.E. 91, 150 Mass. 56, 1889 Mass. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-gray-mass-1889.