Gray v. Gray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gray v. Gray

893 So. 2d 652, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1604, 2005 WL 356996

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gray v. Gray. Read the opinion of the Court — 958 So. 2d 955 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 16, 2005·No. No. 4D04-2171·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals the final judgment of dissolution and raises numerous issues. We affirm in all respects. However, the parties acknowledge the judgment contains scrivener’s errors with regard to mathematical calculations concerning the party’s incomes. We therefore remand the case for correction of these errors. However, we find no error in the ultimate outcome.

Affirmed.

KLEIN, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The former wife appeals the final judgment of dissolution and raises numerous issues. We affirm in all respects. However, the parties acknowledge the judgment contains scrivener’s errors with regard to mathematical calculations concerning the party’s incomes. We therefore remand the case for correction of these errors. However, we find no error in the ultimate outcome.

Affirmed.

KLEIN, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.

Gray v. Gray, 893 So. 2d 652, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 1604, 2005 WL 356996 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

893 So. 2d 652 (Gray v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.