Gray v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 240 A.D. 858 (Gray v. First National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for summary judgment granted as prayed for in the complaint to the extent of $10,239.34, representing the total purchase price of the bonds, with interest and ten dollars costs, on the ground that there was a dedication for a special purpose of the money to pay for the bonds ordered; and that when the order had been filled the bank held the money as the agent and bailee of plaintiff and as a special deposit; and it thereby became liable to complete the purchase or pay over the amount to plaintiff on deínand. (Marine Bank v. Fulton Bank, 2 Wall. 252, 256; Northern Sugar Corporation v. Thompson, 13 F. [2d] 829, 832; Fogg v. Tyler, 109 Me. 109, 114; State v. Grills, 35 R. I. 70; People v. City Bank of Rochester, 96 N. Y. 32.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 A.D. 858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-first-national-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1933.