Gray v. First National Bank & Trust Co.

240 A.D. 858

Opinion

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for summary judgment granted as prayed for in the complaint to the extent of $10,239.34, representing the total purchase price of the bonds, with interest and ten dollars costs, on the ground that there was a dedication for a special purpose of the money to pay for the bonds ordered; and that when the order had been filled the bank held the money as the agent and bailee of plaintiff and as a special deposit; and it thereby became liable to complete the purchase or pay over the amount to plaintiff on deínand. (Marine Bank v. Fulton Bank, 2 Wall. 252, 256; Northern Sugar Corporation v. Thompson, 13 F. [2d] 829, 832; Fogg v. Tyler, 109 Me. 109, 114; State v. Grills, 35 R. I. 70; People v. City Bank of Rochester, 96 N. Y. 32.) Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. First National Bank & Trust Co., 240 A.D. 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

240 A.D. 858 (Gray v. First National Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marine Bank v. Fulton Bank
69 U.S. 252 (Supreme Court, 1865)
The People v. . the City Bank of Rochester
96 N.Y. 32 (New York Court of Appeals, 1884)
Fogg v. Tyler
82 A. 1008 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1912)