Gray v. Fifield

59 N.H. 131
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1879·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

The referee was warranted in finding that the defendant was in a position to receive notice of a suit from a summons left at his home in Franklin. Not only his legal domicile, but his place of abode, within the meaning of the statute, was in this state. Gilman v. Cutts, 23 N. H. 376, 385 — S. C., 27 N. H. 348, 358; Ward v. Cole, 32 N. H. 452; Brown v. Rollins, 44 N. H. 446.

Judgment for the defendant.

Bingham, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. Fifield, 59 N.H. 131 (N.H. 1879).

59 N.H. 131 (Gray v. Fifield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quarles v. Bickford
13 A. 642 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1887)