Gray v. Eaton

5 Cal. 448
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 5 Cal. 448 (Gray v. Eaton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. Eaton, 5 Cal. 448 (Cal. 1855).

Opinion

Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Bryan, J., concurred.

The Chancellor directed certain issues to be determined by a jury. This he had the right to do, as it might aid to inform his conscience. By the finding he is not bound any more than in his sound judgment it is supported by the evidence. So in his decree he may be governed by it, or he may disregard it.

The application, therefore, of the defendants for a new trial upon the issues, was supererogatory; because the Judge had not yet decreed upon the verdict. But if he had, it was a matter in his mere discretion, to grant or refuse the application, which is not revisable.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gray v. Larrimore
10 F. Cas. 1025 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California, 1865)
Duff v. Fisher
15 Cal. 375 (California Supreme Court, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Cal. 448, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-eaton-cal-1855.