Gray v. Duke Power Co.

57 S.E.2d 316, 231 N.C. 423, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 450
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 3, 1950·No. 167·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

A careful perusal of tbe record leaves us with tbe impression that as tbe trial court might well have directed a verdict for tbe respondent, Duke Power Company, on tbe second issue, any errors committed on tbe trial of this issue are perforce harmless.

Nevertheless, an examination of tbe record reveals that no new or novel question of law is presented by any of tbe exceptions, and that they fall well within tbe decided cases on tbe subject. It would only be threshing over old straw to consider them seriatim or in detail. Tbe issue was one of fact determinable alone by tbe jury.

We are constrained to uphold tbe validity of tbe trial on tbe record as presented.

No error.

Ervin, J., took no part in tbe consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. Duke Power Co., 57 S.E.2d 316, 231 N.C. 423, 1950 N.C. LEXIS 450 (N.C. 1950).

57 S.E.2d 316 (Gray v. Duke Power Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westbrook ex rel. Westbrook v. Robinson
181 S.E.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Freeman v. Preddy
76 S.E.2d 159 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Bruce v. O'Neal Flying Service, Inc.
66 S.E.2d 312 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)