Gray v. Dickey

20 Ind. 96
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1863·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was an action by the appellee, who was the plaintff, against James W. and Malinda Gray, to foreclose a mortgage. The record avers that process, on the defendants, was duly served, &c.; that they were called, &c., and, failing to appear, were defaulted, and judgment by default was regularly entered against them. But no motion to set aside the default appears to have been made in the lower Court. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor does it appear that any exception, in any form, was taken to the rulings of the Common Pleas. The cause is, therefore, not properly before us.

The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gray v. Dickey, 20 Ind. 96 (Ind. 1863).

20 Ind. 96 (Gray v. Dickey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fisk v. Baker
47 Ind. 534 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Barnes v. Conner
39 Ind. 294 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)
Yancy v. Teter
39 Ind. 305 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1872)