Gray v. Dickey
This text of 20 Ind. 96 (Gray v. Dickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action by the appellee, who was the plaintff, against James W. and Malinda Gray, to foreclose a mortgage. The record avers that process, on the defendants, was duly served, &c.; that they were called, &c., and, failing to appear, were defaulted, and judgment by default was regularly entered against them. But no motion to set aside the default appears to have been made in the lower Court. The record contains no bill of exceptions, nor does it appear that any exception, in any form, was taken to the rulings of the Common Pleas. The cause is, therefore, not properly before us.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 Ind. 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-dickey-ind-1863.