Gray v. DETROIT MUN. PARKING DEPT.
This text of 753 N.W.2d 149 (Gray v. DETROIT MUN. PARKING DEPT.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jimmy Lee GRAY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellee, and
Jimmylee Gray, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DETROIT MUNICIPAL PARKING DEPARTMENT and Administrative Hearings Officers, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the April 1, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motions for stay and to expand the record are DENIED. The motion to strike is GRANTED. The motion for peremptory reversal is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
753 N.W.2d 149, 482 Mich. 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-detroit-mun-parking-dept-mich-2008.