Gray v. Department of Public Safety of the State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gray v. Department of Public Safety of the State of Missouri

823 S.W.2d 538, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 290, 1992 WL 31787

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 25, 1992·No. No. 60178·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from a court order sustaining department’s motion to dismiss his petition for review. We affirm. The order of the trial court is not erroneous and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals from a court order sustaining department’s motion to dismiss his petition for review. We affirm. The order of the trial court is not erroneous and an extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gray v. Department of Public Safety of the State of Missouri, 823 S.W.2d 538, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 290, 1992 WL 31787 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

823 S.W.2d 538 (Gray v. Department of Public Safety of the State of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.