Gray v. Corey
48 Cal. 208
Opinion
The Court below held that there was not an actual or immediate delivery and continued change of possession of the personal property, sued for in this action, so as to render the sale valid as against the creditors of Donnellan. We think this conclusion is sustained by the finding of facts.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. Corey, 48 Cal. 208 (Cal. 1874).
48 Cal. 208 (Gray v. Corey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'Connor v. O'Connor, Rice & Barnes
111 P.2d 656 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Rosenbaum v. Hayes
79 N.W. 987 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1899)
Lowe v. Matson
35 Ill. App. 602 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)