Gray v. Corey
48 Cal. 208
This text of 48 Cal. 208 (Gray v. Corey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gray v. Corey, 48 Cal. 208 (Cal. 1874).
Opinion
The Court below held that there was not an actual or immediate delivery and continued change of possession of the personal property, sued for in this action, so as to render the sale valid as against the creditors of Donnellan. We think this conclusion is sustained by the finding of facts.
Judgment affirmed.
Mr. Justice Rhodes did not express an opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
O'Connor v. O'Connor, Rice & Barnes
111 P.2d 656 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Rosenbaum v. Hayes
79 N.W. 987 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1899)
Lowe v. Matson
35 Ill. App. 602 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
48 Cal. 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-corey-cal-1874.