Gray v. Cohen

84 P. 444, 3 Cal. App. 75, 1906 Cal. App. LEXIS 213

• Court: California Court of Appeal
• Decided: February 12, 1906
• Docket: Civ. No. 140.
• Status: Published

Opinion

COOPER, J.

Appeal from the judgment on the judgment-roll, without a bill of exceptions.

The action was brought to foreclose an alleged lien under a street assessment. The answer denied the validity of the alleged lien, and of the several acts and matters leading up to the assessment, and concluded with a prayer that plaintiffs “be forever barred and estopped from hereafter instituting or prosecuting any action or proceeding against this defendant or the real estate described in the complaint in this action.” The findings of the court were for defendant, and judgment was ordered and entered “forever barring and estopping the plaintiff from hereafter instituting or prosecuting any action against said defendant, or the real estate described in said complaint.”

The sole point made on this appeal is that the' relief granted exceeds that asked for in the answer, and is more comprehensive in its terms than the law warrants. The point is en tirely devoid of merit. The judgment follows the language of the prayer of the answer. Its language must he construed with reference to, and in connection with, the case made by the pleadings and the subject matter before the court. It was not intended that the decree should, nor would it, estop the plaintiff from prosecuting an entirely different action, or one arising after the date of the judgment herein, against defendant or the real estate described in the complaint. The language used must be construed to have been used with reference to the matter before the court, and the law applicable thereto.

The judgment is affirmed.

Harrison, P. J., and Hall, J., concurred.