Gray v. City of New York

2021 NY Slip Op 03991, 145 N.Y.S.3d 802, 195 A.D.3d 538
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 2021
DocketIndex No. 157840/13 Appeal No. 14110 Case No. 2020-01777
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03991 (Gray v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. City of New York, 2021 NY Slip Op 03991, 145 N.Y.S.3d 802, 195 A.D.3d 538 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Gray v City of New York (2021 NY Slip Op 03991)
Gray v City of New York
2021 NY Slip Op 03991
Decided on June 22, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: June 22, 2021
Before: Renwick, J.P., Kennedy, Scarpulla, Mendez, JJ.

Index No. 157840/13 Appeal No. 14110 Case No. 2020-01777

[*1]Thelma Gray, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

The City of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Craig L. Davidowitz, P.C., New York (Nolan Matz of counsel), for appellant.

James E. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lyle E. Frank, J.), entered November 7, 2019, which granted defendants' (City) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In this personal injury action, where plaintiff was injured when she tripped and fell over a raised Department of Water Supply manhole cover, the City established prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not receive prior written notice of the alleged dangerous condition as required by Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-201(c)(2) (see Yarborough v City of New York, 10 NY3d 726, 728 [2008]). Plaintiff's conclusory allegations do not create a triable issue with respect to

any of the exceptions to the written notice requirement (see Villaret v City of New York, 236 AD2d 216 [1st Dept 1997]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 22, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 33642(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Fatty v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 32532(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Acevedo v. City of New York
2024 NY Slip Op 31148(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2024)
Ramos v. City of New York
180 N.Y.S.3d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03991, 145 N.Y.S.3d 802, 195 A.D.3d 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2021.