Gray v. City of New York
906 N.E.2d 1080, 12 N.Y.3d 802, 879 N.Y.S.2d 46, 2009 NY Slip Op 68833, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 613
Opinion
[803]*803Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed Supreme Court’s grant of the motion to amend the answer, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Best v Yutaka, 90 NY2d 833, 834 n [1997]; Muro v Bay Ready Mix & Supplies, 97 NY2d 625 [2001]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray v. City of New York, 906 N.E.2d 1080, 12 N.Y.3d 802, 879 N.Y.S.2d 46, 2009 NY Slip Op 68833, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 613 (N.Y. 2009).
906 N.E.2d 1080 (Gray v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Best v. Nemoto Yutaka
683 N.E.2d 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Muro v. Bay Ready Mix & Supplies, Inc.
760 N.E.2d 1280 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)