Gray v. City of New York

906 N.E.2d 1080, 12 N.Y.3d 802, 879 N.Y.S.2d 46, 2009 NY Slip Op 68833, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 613
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 7, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 906 N.E.2d 1080 (Gray v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. City of New York, 906 N.E.2d 1080, 12 N.Y.3d 802, 879 N.Y.S.2d 46, 2009 NY Slip Op 68833, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 613 (N.Y. 2009).

Opinion

[803]*803Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed Supreme Court’s grant of the motion to amend the answer, dismissed upon the ground that such part of the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see Best v Yutaka, 90 NY2d 833, 834 n [1997]; Muro v Bay Ready Mix & Supplies, 97 NY2d 625 [2001]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Best v. Nemoto Yutaka
683 N.E.2d 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Muro v. Bay Ready Mix & Supplies, Inc.
760 N.E.2d 1280 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
906 N.E.2d 1080, 12 N.Y.3d 802, 879 N.Y.S.2d 46, 2009 NY Slip Op 68833, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-city-of-new-york-ny-2009.