Gray v. Badgett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Gray v. Badgett

5 Ark. 16

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 15, 1842

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Ark. 16 (Gray v. Badgett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray v. Badgett, 5 Ark. 16 (Ark. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Dickinson, J.

The question of set-off was fully discussed in the case of Tramell vs. Harrell, decided at the present term of this Court, and there held, that a joint demand cannot be set off against a separate one, nor e converso. If the doctrine there held be true, and that it is we have no doubt, Badgett could not offset the individual debt due Hudspeth, against the joint claim of McLain & Badgett. Judgment reversed.

A petition for reconsideration was filed by defendant in error, but overruled, at January term, 1843.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Dickinson, J.

The question of set-off was fully discussed in the case of Tramell vs. Harrell, decided at the present term of this Court, and there held, that a joint demand cannot be set off against a separate one, nor e converso. If the doctrine there held be true, and that it is we have no doubt, Badgett could not offset the individual debt due Hudspeth, against the joint claim of McLain & Badgett. Judgment reversed.

A petition for reconsideration was filed by defendant in error, but overruled, at January term, 1843.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ark. 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-badgett-ark-1842.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack