Gray v. Angier

62 Ga. 596
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 62 Ga. 596 (Gray v. Angier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gray v. Angier, 62 Ga. 596 (Ga. 1879).

Opinion

Warner, Chief Justice.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant’s intestate on a certain instrument in writing therein described and set forth, and on the trial thereof the juiy found a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $8230.50 principal, and the sum of $6583.44 interest. A motion was made for a new trial on the grounds therein stated, which was overruled, and the defendant excepted.

The only ground of error insisted, on here was, that the verdict for interest was too large, in view of the evidence in regard to the alleged tender of the money by the defendant to the plaintiff, and that the court erred in its charge to the jury in relation to that point in the case. The evidence in the record is that two tenders of the money in payment of the debt were made to Solomon, who was then the owner of it, by Field, one of the defendants who then owed the money, and that Solomon declined to receive it, the witness stating “that 1 used the money tendered Solomon in other ways, when Solomon refused to accept it.’’ The tender relied on to stop the interest should have been a continuing tender, that is to say, that the money tendered was, and always has been, ready for the plaintiff, and not as in this case used by the defendant for his own benefit. Chitty on Contracts, marginal page, 697; 10 Ga. Rep., 127; 50 Ib., 614; 54 Ib., 498. There was no error in the charge of the court in relation to this point in the case. Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heath v. Miller
54 S.E.2d 432 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1949)
Fitzgerald v. Vaughn
7 S.E.2d 78 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Pape v. Woolford Realty Co.
134 S.E. 174 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Carson v. Blair
121 S.E. 517 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Ragan v. Newton
109 S.E. 412 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Sutton v. Coleman
108 S.E. 803 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Fortson v. Strickland
99 S.E. 147 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Washington Exchange Bank v. Smith
98 S.E. 418 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Parker v. . Beasley
21 S.E. 955 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1895)
Thompson v. Lyon
20 S.E. 812 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 Ga. 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-v-angier-ga-1879.