Gray Pizzuto v. McCoid

Fourth Circuit

Gray Pizzuto v. McCoid

488 F. App'x 721

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 15, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1872

StatusPublished

This text of 488 F. App'x 721 (Gray Pizzuto v. McCoid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gray Pizzuto v. McCoid, 488 F. App'x 721 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol L. Gray Pizzuto seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Pizzuto does not challenge in her informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant Pizzuto’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carol L. Gray Pizzuto seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice her civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Pizzuto does not challenge in her informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we grant Pizzuto’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

488 F. App'x 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gray-pizzuto-v-mccoid-ca4-2012.