Gray Lumber Co. v. Lockridge
69 S.E. 170, 135 Ga. 230, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 495
Opinion
Under the pleadings and evidence the judge did not abuse his discretion in granting an order on the interlocutory hearing of the application for injunction, -which, in effect, temporarily enjoined both parties from cutting, or removing the timber from the land in dispute.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gray Lumber Co. v. Lockridge, 69 S.E. 170, 135 Ga. 230, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 495 (Ga. 1910).
69 S.E. 170 (Gray Lumber Co. v. Lockridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nemchik v. Riggs
792 S.E.2d 347 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)