Gravley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

553 So. 2d 52, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 534, 1989 WL 107109
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJuly 21, 1989
Docket88-338
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 553 So. 2d 52 (Gravley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gravley v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 553 So. 2d 52, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 534, 1989 WL 107109 (Ala. 1989).

Opinion

The issue in this case is whether Alabama, North Carolina, or South Carolina law should apply to the insurance policy providing uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage involved in this case. Our cases of Best v. Auto-Owners Ins. Co.,540 So.2d 1381 (Ala. 1989), and Cotton v. State Farm Mut. Auto.Ins. Co., 540 So.2d 1387 (Ala. 1989), hold that the law of the state where the insurance contract was made and maintained will control absent a contrary provision in the contract. Therefore, the judgment is affirmed on the authority of Best and Cotton.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and ALMON, ADAMS and STEAGALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Zitterow v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
669 So. 2d 109 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1995)
Ferris v. Jennings
851 F. Supp. 418 (M.D. Alabama, 1993)
Bohannan v. Allstate Insurance Co.
1991 OK 64 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
553 So. 2d 52, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 534, 1989 WL 107109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gravley-v-nationwide-mut-ins-co-ala-1989.