Graves v. Stevens

Fourth Circuit

Graves v. Stevens

540 F. App'x 203

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 2013

DocketNo. 13-6991

StatusPublished

This text of 540 F. App'x 203 (Graves v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graves v. Stevens, 540 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Graves appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil rights complaint and dismissing his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graves v. Stevens, No. 3:12-cv-00826-JFA, 2012 WL 4097275 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2012; June 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[204]*204fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Graves appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil rights complaint and dismissing his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graves v. Stevens, No. 3:12-cv-00826-JFA, 2012 WL 4097275 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2012; June 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[204]*204fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

540 F. App'x 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-stevens-ca4-2013.