Graves v. Stevens

Fourth Circuit

Graves v. Stevens

540 F. App'x 203

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2013·No. No. 13-6991·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Graves appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil rights complaint and dismissing his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graves v. Stevens, No. 3:12-cv-00826-JFA, 2012 WL 4097275 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2012; June 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[204] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Graves appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil rights complaint and dismissing his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graves v. Stevens, No. 3:12-cv-00826-JFA, 2012 WL 4097275 (D.S.C. Sept. 18, 2012; June 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[204] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Graves v. Stevens, 540 F. App'x 203 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

540 F. App'x 203 (Graves v. Stevens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.