Graves v. State

274 S.W.2d 555, 161 Tex. Crim. 16, 1955 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1306
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 19, 1955
Docket27345
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 274 S.W.2d 555 (Graves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graves v. State, 274 S.W.2d 555, 161 Tex. Crim. 16, 1955 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1306 (Tex. 1955).

Opinion

WOODLEY, Judge.

The indictment returned against appellant charged that he made an assault upon and did ravish and have carnal knowledge of a named female under 18 years of age, who was not his wife. Trial resulted in a verdict of guilty, the jury assessing a punishment of five years in the penitentiary. Appellant’s application for suspended sentence was not granted.

The evidence is insufficient to sustain conviction for statutory rape for the reason that the prosecutrix was admittedly of unchaste character.

The trial court, in his charge, authorized a conviction upon a finding by the jury that appellant ravished and obtained carnal knowledge of the prosecutrix by threats such as might reason *17 ably create a just fear of death or great bodily harm in view of the relative condition of the parties as to health, strength and other circumstances of the case. No objections were made to the charge.

The question for our determination is therefore whether or not proof of rape by threats will sustain a conviction under indictment which charges only that the accused assaulted, ravished and had carnal knowledge of the named female under 18 years of age, who was not his wife.

Stated in another way, are the allegations of the indictment sufficient to include rape by threats as well as by force?

The state confesses that such manner of commission of the offense of rape is not included in the allegations of the indictment, and that the case should not have been submitted to the jury on the theory of rape by threats. We are inclined to agree.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remandel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Booker v. State
523 S.W.2d 413 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1975)
Beshears v. State
461 S.W.2d 122 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)
Rodrigues v. State
308 S.W.2d 39 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
274 S.W.2d 555, 161 Tex. Crim. 16, 1955 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-state-texcrimapp-1955.