Graves v. State

3 S.W.2d 434
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Graves v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 915
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 29, 1928·No. No. 11407·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for misdemeanor swindling; punishment being a fine of $100 and confinement in the county jail for 24 hours.

No statement of facts accompanies the record. Three special charges were requested and are simply marked “Refused.” It is not made to appear by formal bill of exception nor by notation on the charges themselves over the trial judge’s signature that exception was reserved to the refusal to give them. In one nr the other of such methods, it must be shown that exception was taken to the action of the court. Linder v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 316, 250 S. W. 703, and authorities collated therein. Also, see Cunningham v. State, 97 Tex. Cr. R. 624, 262 S. W. 491. Even if the requested charges could be considered, it is impossible for this court to determine whether they were applicable in the absence of the facts.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graves v. State, 3 S.W.2d 434 (Tex. 1928).

3 S.W.2d 434 (Graves v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cunningham v. State
262 S.W. 492 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Linder v. State
250 S.W. 703 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)
Cunningham v. State
262 S.W. 491 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1924)