Graves v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Graves v. State

544 S.W.3d 327

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 2018

DocketWD 80709

StatusPublished

This text of 544 S.W.3d 327 (Graves v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graves v. State, 544 S.W.3d 327 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Graves appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He claims the trial court clearly erred because reasonably competent counsel would have investigated and presented evidence that the victim was killed by a shot fired by someone other than Graves and that would have changed the outcome of Graves's trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Graves appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. He claims the trial court clearly erred because reasonably competent counsel would have investigated and presented evidence that the victim was killed by a shot fired by someone other than Graves and that would have changed the outcome of Graves's trial. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

544 S.W.3d 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-state-moctapp-2018.