Graves v. OneWest Bank, FSB

653 F. App'x 788
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2503
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 653 F. App'x 788 (Graves v. OneWest Bank, FSB) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graves v. OneWest Bank, FSB, 653 F. App'x 788 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

DeAlva Graves and Rodney Ryan Graves appeals the district court’s order dismissing their complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graves v. OneWest Bank, FSB, No. 8:14-cv-01995-PWG, 2015 WL 6769115 (D. Md. Nov. 2, 2015). We deny the Graves’ motion for injunctive relief and to consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
653 F. App'x 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-onewest-bank-fsb-ca4-2016.