Graves v. Morequity, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Graves v. Morequity, Inc.

51 So. 3d 639, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 563, 2011 WL 148821

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2011·No. No. 1D10-4756·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 20, 2010, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Cunningham v. MBNA America Bank, N.A., 8 So.3d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal from order on a claim for abuse of process and on claims raised under consumer protection statutes where related claim seeking collection of debt remained pending). The order on appeal is not reviewable as a partial final judgment under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). See Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 20, 2010, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Cunningham v. MBNA America Bank, N.A., 8 So.3d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal from order on a claim for abuse of process and on claims raised under consumer protection statutes where related claim seeking collection of debt remained pending). The order on appeal is not reviewable as a partial final judgment under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). See Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Graves v. Morequity, Inc., 51 So. 3d 639, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 563, 2011 WL 148821 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

51 So. 3d 639 (Graves v. Morequity, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related