Graves v. Morequity, Inc.

51 So. 3d 639, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 563, 2011 WL 148821
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 2011
DocketNo. 1D10-4756
StatusPublished

This text of 51 So. 3d 639 (Graves v. Morequity, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graves v. Morequity, Inc., 51 So. 3d 639, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 563, 2011 WL 148821 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of September 20, 2010, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Cunningham v. MBNA America Bank, N.A., 8 So.3d 438 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (dismissing appeal from order on a claim for abuse of process and on claims raised under consumer protection statutes where related claim seeking collection of debt remained pending). The order on appeal is not reviewable as a partial final judgment under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). See Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

DAVIS, HAWKES, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cunningham v. MBNA America Bank, N.A.
8 So. 3d 438 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Jensen v. Whetstine
985 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 So. 3d 639, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 563, 2011 WL 148821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-morequity-inc-fladistctapp-2011.