Graves v. Lee
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-60230 Summary Calendar __________________
JERRY D. GRAVES,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
ANN LEE; HERMAN PARKER; LARRY HARDY; EDWARD M. HARGETT,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 4:95-CV-218-JAD - - - - - - - - - - July 16, 1996
Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jerry D. Graves, #40995/#32179, appeals the dismissal of his
suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), the relevant portion of
which is now redesignated as 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). He
argues that the Mississippi Department of Corrections applies its
grooming regulations in a way which violates the First Amendment
and principles of equal protection, that prison disciplinary
proceedings violated principles of equal protection and due
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-60230 -2-
process, and that the magistrate judge erred in his analysis of
Graves's claims under Sandin v. Conner, 115 S. Ct. 2293 (1995).
We have reviewed the record and Graves's brief and AFFIRM the
dismissal for essentially the same reasons set forth by the
magistrate judge, who heard the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(c). Graves v. Lee et al., No. 4:95CV218-JAD (N.D. Ms. Mar.
26, 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graves v. Lee (Graves v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.