Graves v. Hicks
This text of 77 N.E. 831 (Graves v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was heard before a judge of the Superior Court. He made a memorandum, and a final decree was entered for the plaintiff. The case is before us upon an appeal by the defendant Hicks from that decree. The decree is certainly supported by the findings. It is objected that the findings were not warranted by the evidence.
The evidence was largely oral. In such a case the findings of the trial court are not to be set aside unless they are clearly wrong. The evidence has been carefully considered, and we are of opinion that it amply warrants the findings, and we cannot say that they are wrong. The decree is to be so far modified as to include the costs of this appeal, and as so modified should be affirmed.
So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 N.E. 831, 191 Mass. 102, 1906 Mass. LEXIS 1231, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-hicks-mass-1906.