Graves v. Hallowell
This text of 600 F. App'x 148 (Graves v. Hallowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Earl Graves appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissing Graves’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, and he has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Limiting our review to the issues raised in the informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Graves’ application to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Graves v. Hallowell, No. 5:13-ct-03152-D, 2014 WL 4741250 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 23, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 F. App'x 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-hallowell-ca4-2015.