Graves v. Delaplaine

11 Johns. 200
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1814
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Johns. 200 (Graves v. Delaplaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graves v. Delaplaine, 11 Johns. 200 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit read is neither proper ñor suffi-> cient evidence to show that the witnesses are incompetent, on the ground of interest. If we are to deny the commission, it ought to be on the same evidence, as to the fact of interest, which would be proper and sufficient, at the' trial of the' cause, to show the incompetency. The affidavit or testimony of the defendant, would not be admitted for that purpose. Besides, if the witnesses have any interest, it may be that it will be released before their examination, so as to render them competent. We think the commission ought to issue. •

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Johns. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-delaplaine-nysupct-1814.